日本では、永い歴史の中で天然繊維及び化学繊維を製造している。 その天然繊維及び化学繊維の製造の歴史および特徴を確認するとともに、高校家庭科の授業で繊維に関する内容の扱いにおいて、知識・理解を深め、興味・関心を引き出し今後の衣生活に繊維の扱い方や衣生活に活用できるようにする。

現在、全世界で注視しているSDGｓについて、日本では意識が低く、目標達成には程遠い現状にある。小学校・中学校・高等学校と家庭科の内容からＳＤＧｓについて、学習内容に深い関係があると考える。現状把握について指導しているが、意識改革までには至っていないところがある。そこで、高校家庭科の学習で取り上あげ高校生としてできることはないか考察することとした。具体的に授業で示すことにより、さらなる意識の向上及び実践的活動に繋げたい。

The onion fly, Delia antiqua (Diptera: Anthomyiidae) spends hot summers and cold winters in the pupal stage. Pupal diapause is determined by the temperature and photoperiod of the larval stage and the temperature of the pupal stage. When the larvae were reared under various photoperiods at 25°C and the pupae were kept at 25°C after pupation, the rate of diapause tended to be slightly lower in photoperiods longer than 13 h in the light period. When the larvae and pupae were kept at 20°C, the rate of diapause was 80% or more in photoperiods with a light period shorter than 13 h. However, the rate of diapause gradually decreased during longer photoperiods, and when the light periods were longer than 16 h, it decreased to approximately 25%. The larvae were reared under light-dark conditions (12 h light: 12 h darkness) (LD 12: 12), 14: 10, 18: 6, and 24: 0 at 30, 25, and 20°C and the pupae were kept in continuous darkness (DD) at 30, 25, 20, and 15°C. When the larvae were reared at 30 and 25°C and the pupae were kept at 25°C, the rate of diapause was 15% or less regardless of the photoperiod. When the pupae were kept at 30 and 20°C, the rate of diapause was 50−75% and almost 100% at 15°C. When the larvae were reared under LD 14: 10, 16: 8, and 24: 0 at 20°C and the pupae were kept at 25°C, the rate of diapause was 15% or less. The rate of diapause the pupal temperature of 30°C was 50−75%, at 20°C was 30−65%, and at 15°C was almost 100%. When the larvae were reared under LD 12: 12 at 20°C, the rate of diapause at pupal temperature of 30°C was 50−75%, at 25°C was approximately 55%, and it was almost 100% at 15°C. When the larvae were reared under LD 12: 12 at 20°C and the pupae were kept for 4 weeks under DD at 20°C after pupation. And the pupae were transferred from 20°C to 7°C and then kept for 10, and 15 weeks at 7°C and then transferred to 25°C. When the pupae were kept for 10 weeks at 7C, adult emergence was concentrated the 11th day (the 109th day after pupation) after transition to 25°C, and on the 10th day (the 143th day). This indicates that diapause was broken by low temperatures (7°C). When pupae were kept under DD at 20°C after pupation, adult emergence started around 50 days after pupation and continued for more than 50 days thereafter. No concentration of emergence was observed even when the temperature was changed to 7°C after the emergence adults. This indicates that diapause was broken at 20°C. The larvae were reared under continuous light at 15°C and the pupae were kept under DD at 7°C after pupation and transferred to 25°C. When the pupae were kept at 7°C for 1 to 20 weeks, the longer the period of 7°C, the shorter the period from the transition to 25°C adult emergence. Adult emergence was concentrated when the 7°C period was 11 weeks or more, and the tendency was more pronounced as the 7°C period increased. When the larvae were reared under LD 12: 12 at 30 and 25°C and the pupae were kept under DD at 30, 25, 20, and 15°C, the rates of diapause were compared in 1981 and 2005. When the rates of diapause when the larvae were reared at 20°C, was compared between 1981, 2005, and 2006. When the larvae were reared at 30 and 25°C, the rate of diapause was lower in 1981 than in 2005, regardless of the temperature of the pupae. However, when the larvae were reared at 20°C, the rate of diapause was higher in 1981 than in 2005 and 2006, regardless of pupal temperature. These results indicated that many years of successive rearing influenced pupal diapause decisions. The most interesting finding was that in many years of successive rearing, the selective pressure for diapause changed with the rearing temperature of the larvae. This elucidation will be clarified by through genetic analysis in the future.

個人情報保護法は「個人の権利利益の保護」と「個人情報の有用性」のバランスを図るための法律であり、2003年の成立以降、社会情勢や技術の進歩に合わせて改正されている。3年ごとの見直しとして初めて行われた2020年改正は、「個人の権利利益の保護」、「情報活用の強化」、「AI・ビッグデータへの対応」などを目的としたものであった。 2021年改正は、個人情報保護法、行政機関個人情報保護法、独立行政法人等個人情報保護法の3本の法律を1本の法律に統合するとともに、地方公共団体の個人情報保護制度についても統合後の法律における全国的な共通ルールを規定し、全体の所管を個人情報保護委員会に一元化するものである。このような状況下において、診療情報の利活用について検討した。

個人情報保護法は「個人の権利利益の保護」と「個人情報の有用性」のバランスを図るための法律であり、2003年の成立以降、社会情勢や技術の進歩に合わせて改正されている。3年ごとの見直しとして初めて行われた2020年改正は、「個人の権利利益の保護」、「情報活用の強化」、「AI・ビッグデータへの対応」などを目的としたものであった。 2021年改正は、個人情報保護法、行政機関個人情報保護法、独立行政法人等個人情報保護法の3本の法律を1本の法律に統合するとともに、地方公共団体の個人情報保護制度についても統合後の法律における全国的な共通ルールを規定し、全体の所管を個人情報保護委員会に一元化するものである。このような状況下において、診療情報の利活用について検討した。